Representing estates and facilities professionals operating within the  
 
 

News

 
15
Dec

PAC criticism for CQC


The Committee of Public Accounts (PAC) has raised new concerns about the performance of the Care Quality Commission, the independent regulator of health and adult social care in England.

 

The PAC recognises the Commission has made "substantial progress" since 2012 but finds "it is behind where it should be, six years after it was established, in that it is not yet an effective regulator.”

 

The report from the PAC highlights the significant impact staff shortages are having on the Commission’s ability to complete its inspection programme, and identifies weaknesses in the consistency, accuracy and timeliness of its initial draft reports. 

 

The Committee is also concerned about the Commission’s ability to respond quickly and effectively to information received from service users and staff, in particular issues raised by whistleblowers, as well as the quality of information on offer to people seeking a care provider.

 

Measures to assess the Commission’s performance remain inadequate and it is still unclear how the Commission will implement and coordinate the new responsibilities for assessing hospitals’ use of resources that is takes on from April 2016. In addition, the Commission does not yet have the quantified performance measures, linked to explicit targets, that are needed to show whether it is satisfactorily performing its statutory duties.

 

 

The Committee’s recommendations to Government set out measures to address these points, as well as a framework of deadlines by which it expects to see improvement.

 

Meg Hillier MP, Chair of the PAC, says: "Six years after being set up the Care Quality Commission is still not fully effective. There’s too often a long gap between inspections and reports being published - and sometimes an alarming lack of attention to detail when reports are being prepared.

 

“One NHS Foundation Trust told us staff had identified more than 200 errors in a draft Commission report, including data inaccuracies. The fact these errors were picked up offers some reassurance but this is clearly unacceptable from a public body in which taxpayers are placing their trust.

 

“Recruitment at the Commission is going too slowly, meaning too many members of the public don’t have up-to-date independent information about the quality of services provided. It is vital the public is clear on what the Commission has actually inspected, and when.

 

“If the Commission is to properly fulfil its duty to taxpayers we must see improvements in the way it collects, acts upon and publishes information. At the same time it should set out a coherent plan for managing its new responsibilities.

 

“When the Commission falls short, there must be robust measures in place to enable Parliament and the public to hold it to account."

Archive